Inconsistency-tolerant reasoning with OWL DL
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a family of description logic based ontology languages for the Semantic Web and gives well defined meaning to web accessible information and services. The study of inconsistency-tolerant reasoning with description logic knowledge bases is especially important for the Semantic Web since knowledge is not always perfect within it. An important challenge is strengthening the inference power of inconsistency-tolerant reasoning because it is normally impossible for paraconsistent logics to obey all important properties of inference together. This paper presents a non-classical DL called quasi-classical description logic (QCDL) to tolerate inconsistency in OWL DL which is a most important sublanguage of OWL supporting those users who want the maximum expressiveness while retaining computational completeness (i.e., all conclusions are guaranteed to be computable) and decidability (i.e., all computations terminate in finite time). Instead of blocking those inference rules, we validate them conditionally and partially, under which more useful information can still be inferred when inconsistency occurs. This new non-classical DL possesses several important properties as well as its paraconsistency in DL, but it does not bring any extra complexity in worst case. Finally, a transformationbased algorithm is proposed to reduce reasoning problems in QCDL to those in DL so that existing OWL DL reasoners can be used to implement inconsistencytolerant reasoning. Based on this algorithm, a prototype OWL DL paraconsistent reasoner called PROSE is implemented. Preliminary experiments show that PROSE produces more intuitive results for inconsistent knowledge bases than other systems in general.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of Ontologies and DL Reasoners
Ontology driven architecture has revolutionized the inference system by allowing interoperability and efficient reasoning between heterogeneous multivendors systems. Sound reasoning support is highly important for sound semantic web ontologies which can only be possible if state-of-the-art Description Logic Reasoners were capable enough to identify inconsistency and classify taxonomy in ontolog...
متن کاملNon Defeated-Based Repair in Possibilistic DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
Possibilistic DL-Lite is an extension of the DL-Lite framework to deal with uncertain pieces of information. In this paper, we deal with inconsistency in DL-Lite in case where the assertions are uncertain and encoded in a possibility theory framework. We investigate three inconsistency-tolerant reasoning methods for possibilistic DL-Lite knowledge bases which are based on the selection of one c...
متن کاملOn the Complexity of Dealing with Inconsistency in Description Logic Ontologies
We study the problem of dealing with inconsistency in Description Logic (DL) ontologies. We consider inconsistency-tolerant semantics recently proposed in the literature, called AR-semantics and CARsemantics, which are based on repairing (i.e., modifying) in a minimal way the extensional knowledge (ABox) while keeping the intensional knowledge (TBox) untouched. We study instance checking and co...
متن کاملExplanation and Diagnosis Services for Unsatisfiability and Inconsistency in Description Logics
Explanation and Diagnosis Services for Unsatisfiability and Inconsistency in Description Logics Xi Deng, Ph.D. Concordia University, 2010 Description Logics (DLs) are a family of knowledge representation formalisms with formal semantics and well understood computational complexities. In recent years, they have found applications in many domains, including domain modeling, software engineering, ...
متن کاملReasoning with Uncertain and Inconsistent OWL Ontologies
Reasoning with uncertainty and inconsistency in description logics are two important issues in the development of description logicbased ontology engineering. When constructing ontologies, one may obtain ontologies that are inconsistent and are pervaded with uncertain information, such as confidence values. In this paper, we propose some approaches to reasoning with inconsistent and uncertain o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Int. J. Approx. Reasoning
دوره 55 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014